“Better, not bigger”
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
Posted: 1 October 2010 | The Rt Hon Theresa Villiers, Minister of State for Transport, United Kingdom | 1 comment
The aviation sector generates billions of pounds worth of economic output and tax revenue, provides large scale employment and enables the UK to compete in the globalised economy. It also delivers significant social benefits as people travel for leisure or to visit friends and family. It is therefore an industry that I want to see thrive and one this Government takes seriously.
The aviation sector generates billions of pounds worth of economic output and tax revenue, provides large scale employment and enables the UK to compete in the globalised economy. It also delivers significant social benefits as people travel for leisure or to visit friends and family. It is therefore an industry that I want to see thrive and one this Government takes seriously.
Recent years have seen global terrorism, rapidly rising and fluctuating oil prices, the financial crisis and global recession and then, earlier this year, the eruption of a volcano that led to the closure of Europe’s airspace. Our dynamic, successful and flexible industry has responded positively to these challenges. Today we have world leading and growing airlines and our airports attract investment from across the globe, accruing the competition and innovation benefits of diverse ownership.
However, we need to acknowledge that the very high levels of growth witnessed in air travel in the years before the recession hit have come at an environmental cost. One of the first announcements made by the Government was confirmation that we oppose construction of additional runways at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted. Our commitments on combating climate change and minimising the impact of airports on local communities makes this the right decision.
We must be original and start a new chapter in aviation policy that promotes a competitive aviation industry, supporting economic growth, while recognising the need for restraint. Our goal is to improve the efficiency of our airports in a way that is consistent with our commitments to protect the environment. I believe that the competitive and innovative instincts of our airport industry will help make this possible.
The fundamental policy principle is to make our airports better, not simply bigger.
We have established the South East Airports Taskforce. Drawing on the skills, experience and expertise of a cross section of the aviation industry, the Taskforce is focused on making the very best use of existing infrastructure to deliver operational improvements at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted and improving conditions for all users.
Furthermore, we signalled in the Queen’s Speech our intention to reform the framework for the economic regulation of airports to benefit passengers and support investment in better facilities. These reforms will replace the current one-size fits all framework with a new licensing regime which can be better tailored to meet the circumstances of individual airports and allow regulation to be reduced where possible.
We must also explore the potential of our regional airports to absorb more of the demand for air services. Heathrow has dominated recent political discourse and this has overshadowed the contribution of other airports to national prosperity. The first flight of an A380 into Manchester last month provided a powerful reminder of the commercial potency of regional cities and the role their airports must have in the future.
The benefits and opportunities provided by flying are woven deep into the fabric of our modern way of life. And the aviation sector has an important role to play in the building of a stronger economy and delivering a cleaner environment. That is why this Government values the industry and is happy to work in partnership with it on meeting the economic and environmental challenges we face in modern Britain.
The foreword to Issue 5 2010 of International Airport Review by the Minister of State for Transport, Teresa Villiers, is indicative of the terrible mess this coalition government is going to make of British aviation if it isn’t careful. Emasculation wouldn’t be too strong a word. I’m not sure Secretary of State Hammond or Minister Villiers have any real idea what they doing, so caught up are they in the eco-demands of the Lib Dems.
Ms Villiers says she wants to see the aviation sector thrive. How? By denying a third Heathrow runway that it needs just to satisfy existing demand properly?
For the sake of brevity I refer to a statement made by the Secretary of State for Transport on 28th July 2010 at a meeting of the all-party Parliamentary Transport Select Committee. He said the UK Government has not only blocked the third runway at Heathrow and second runways for Stansted and Gatwick (implying that this is ‘forever’) but has ruled out increasing capacity at Heathrow on the existing two runways through mixed-mode operations (a method that has been under examination for years). Mr Hammond also rejected the idea that regional airports could expand in place of Heathrow (nearly all the growth in the UK post ‘9/11’ came from regional airports), rejected the Mayor of London’s plan for a new Thames airport to replace Heathrow and restated the Government’s commitment to moving domestic traffic from air to rail (which he confirmed at the Conservative Party Conference this week). He (and Ms Villiers) wants to make airports ‘better, not bigger’, whatever that means, as if they can’t be both. This from the ‘party of big business.’
In summary, there will be no expansion of Britain’s airports during the life of this government, period (and they are already manoeuvring, as politicians do, to perpetuate their power-sharing existence). No attempt will be made to utilise unused capacity at major city airports like Birmingham, Glasgow and Manchester (the latter of which, like Heathrow actually has two runways but less than a third of the traffic), let alone the many secondary level airports. Ms Villiers has the gall to talk about airports like Manchester contributing to national prosperity, and their ‘commercial potency’ when she is totally devoid of ideas as to how the unused infrastructure there might be employed to relieve overcrowding in the southeast of the country. And existing domestic air traffic will be eradicated as soon as possible to be replaced by trains, irrespective of the financial and moral cost of building new lines and ripping up the countryside.
On top of this we are going to be taxed to the hilt if we want to fly. According to the CEO of the British Air Transport Association (and I must assume he did his homework on these figures) the government will raise more than twice as much fiscal revenue in 2010-11 from the Air Passenger Duty (GB£2.9 billion) than from its levy on the banks (GB£1.2 billion). So while the traders are celebrating their bonuses again with jeroboams of Dom Perignon or Krug the ordinary Joes like us continue to pay through the nose for airline flights that will operate from increasingly congested airports for which there are NO PLANS AT ALL for infrastructural enhancement, anywhere, beyond what is already underway. What a way to run a country. “The government values the industry” does it, Ms Villiers? Do me a favour.